Several times, I didn’t understand how I was supposed to proceed, but eventually, the response became obvious to me. I zipped through the first session but soon slowed down as the learning became more complex. With no English translation to guide me, the words and phrases became instinctive rather than terms I translated in my head before speaking.
#ROSETTA STONE SPANISH COURSE REVIEWS PLUS#
Each session included a core lesson plus segments on pronunciation, listening, speaking, grammar, review, reading, writing and vocabulary. Images, paired with Spanish words, appeared on the screen as native speakers pronounced them.
I knew it was finally time to begin those Spanish lessons.Īfter logging in and choosing Spanish (Latin America), the lessons began. Recently, Rosetta Stone offered me a 4-week demo of their online learning course. When I moved to Tucson almost ten years ago, one of my goals was to learn Spanish.
#ROSETTA STONE SPANISH COURSE REVIEWS SOFTWARE#
The computer software program relies on words, pictures and the voices of native speakers rather than dictionaries and grammar books to teach the language. Specializing in language immersion techniques, Rosetta Stone offers over 30 language courses with a varying number of levels depending on the language. Now that we have the time and desire to learn a foreign language, who’s going to teach us? Rosetta Stone. Sure, many of us took Spanish, French, Latin or maybe German in high school but if your experience was anything like mine, it didn’t prepare you to speak the language. Unfortunately, if you’re a baby boomer who was educated in the United States, competency in a foreign language wasn’t emphasized. Although they appear very simple to address, I see the same shortcomings exhibited by every course in the series.Baby boomer travelers, visiting a foreign country is a better experience when you understand the language. Overall, I think it's a good course - it provides a good structure for learning the Spanish language despite the above shortcomings. I used to comment on the message boards for clarifications and to report errors, but after getting zero responses from the professor I stopped participating. I have noticed comments from students who have reported the same issues for the past two years, and those issues are still not corrected.
Lastly, there are errors in the presentations and exams, and little to no involvement from the professor to clarify points and/or correct those issues. In some cases, it seems as though an elegant choice of words to describe a difficult concept is more important than taking the time to deconstruct that concept into simple phrases.ģ). I appreciate the length of the presentations when reviewing the presentations to refresh my memory, but difficult concepts sometimes require more attention than they are given. I also think that some of the topics deserve additional clarifications, and the presentations themselves are very short.
It would be nice if the curriculum were designed so that you could study the vocabulary, take the vocabulary exam, then review the grammar and leverage what you learned in the vocabulary section to re-enforce your learning.Ģ). For example, the grammar presentations refer to new vocabulary words that were not introduced in the vocabulary list, and the vocabulary exams refer to content in the grammar section. I think a little more effort to organize the material would go a long way. Generally speaking I think the course content is good, but I rated this course average because of three main reasons.ġ).
0 kommentar(er)
